Entries Tagged 'In Perspective' ↓
February 22nd, 2010 — In Perspective

Carmen Tita Cervera, widow of industrial magnate Baron Hans Heinrich von Thyssen-Bornemisza, poses in front of her painting “Charing Cross Bridge” by Claude Monet during the media inauguration of the exhibit “Monet and the Abstraction” at Madrid’s Thyssen-Bornemisza museum. REUTERS/Andrea Comas.
Don’t we love the way ArtDaily photographs works of art semi-obscured by people – owners, viewers, fuzzy passers-by, royal visitors – all to avoid the problem of copyright!
February 19th, 2010 — In Perspective
Or is vernacular photography outside the artworld? Read the storm of comments on Bob Gosford’s post on Crikey.
February 4th, 2010 — In Perspective
You’d want to be absolutely sure this isn’t one of an edition, wouldn’t you? Remembering that bronze casting is essentially a reproductive technology… See the story here (with a great photo). Thanks to Amanda for the link.
December 22nd, 2009 — In Perspective
December 18th, 2009 — Alumni biz, Current students' news, In Perspective, Out there

Jan Hogan, PhD, in relaxation mode… Congratulations!
December 2nd, 2009 — In Perspective
November 7th, 2009 — In Perspective
is reviewed on ArtKritique
October 16th, 2009 — In Perspective
see this article in the UK Telegraph
October 13th, 2009 — In Perspective
Read Bridget Riley’s thoughts on drawing in the London Review of Books. Thanks to Breakfastpolitics for the lead…
August 29th, 2009 — In Perspective
Aug 25, 2009 04:30 AM
Joseph Hall
Health Reporter TORONTO STAR
People who zip between iPods, emails, texting, Twitter and cellphone conversations are slower than their less electrified counterparts in one important area – their thinking, researchers say.
In particular, multi-taskers who bristle with gadgetry are significantly poorer at filtering out irrelevant information coming at them and organizing the useful data they do take in, a Stanford University study of 262 students suggests.
And people who flit between multiple electronic and print media are slower at switching between tasks – or multi-tasking – than others, says study co-author Clifford Nass.
“If you take the cognitive skills one would need to be a multi-tasker, they’re worse at all of them,” says Nass, a Stanford social psychologist. “The differences are very, very large and significant … the differences in the way their brains work are clear.”
The study was published yesterday in the journal Proceedings of The National Academy of Sciences.